Letters from NYC

10/20/01

 

Dear All,

 

I'm a great patriot of the American Ideal. I believe in what the country

stands for as written in the language of the Constitution. I don't see

America as the "all-out villain." Hardly. So much gets said from the two

sides of liberal/conservative views trying to get a handle on the right

course of action. As I see the current state of affairs, there are three

distinct aspects that need to be addressed. One, which most of the current

media and political pundits are addressing, is the immediate retaliation by

the American military for the attack. Two is the continuing assault by the

terrorists who are striking us from within our borders. Three is the deeper

problems arising from these events extending far beyond the present goal of

ridding the world of terrorism.

 

As for the first aspect, our military response, we are striking out at an

enemy we do not see. We may even rid one small section of the planet of the

cells of this network, but as we see all too well in the past few days, the

attacks are coming from Hometown, America. The Afghani arm of Al Qaeda is

inactive. We've seen to that. Yet we are continuously being attacked, the

second aspect. This is a different war. We cannot fight it on the

battlefield with great weapons of mass destruction alone. Our military might

is not providing us the comfort we used to get from it. We are afraid now of

the mail delivery. "Don't go out. Don't go in. Don't go underground. Don't

stay above ground. Don't go into buildings. Don't stay outside. Don't open

the mail. Don't travel. Don't stay at home. Don't conduct business. Don't go

out to dinner. Don't continue to govern. Don't. Don't don't don't don't

don't. All our military might can't protect us. What are we to do?

 

I very much agree with the leaders who direct us to continue our lives as

before. We must not allow the forces against us to destroy or decay us. We

must carry on. This is what we're about.

 

I see that this is the beginning of a much bigger fight. Right now

terrorists are the angry voices being heard. But our current military

actions incite further passions against us. There is a war of perceptions

that is being waged. Right now, we have to orient our endeavors to seeking

justice--not retribution. I believe the dominant American view, is

short-sighted to a frightening degree. We can have a great destabilizing

effect on the region by bombing and an all-out military offensive. The more

we continue in this way, the more we risk the backlash slapping us in

unanticipated ways.

 

Certainly we are not solely responsible for the ills of the world, and

certainly we are not responsible for the powerful people who mistreat their

own. Our government and media are representing us to the world by speaking

in absolute terms of evil and terrorism. This means we are painting with the

same colors as our enemies. In the excellent editorial by Stanley Fish in

Monday's NY Times "Condemnation Without Absolutes," he speaks very much to

the heart of the error of our current war tactics. He eloquently argues that

we diminish our cause by the use of absolute terminology that does not

accurately describe the threat or our response to it. If we are to wage a

war that is ultimately winnable, we must fight with greater honesty and

greater humility. Our arrogance may well prove our undoing, because

ultimately, we are not just fighting the armed enemy; we are fighting to

bring greater unification to the world through mutual respect. We must find

the way to honor those whose opinions differ from our own, while ridding the

world of those who are bent on our destruction. Those who disagree with us

and those who want our destruction are not necessarily the same people.

 

We do financially bear a greater responsibility in the world, since we are

the benefactors of the greatest amount of the world's resources. Even if our

current riches are not the mitigating factor in the situation with the

extremists, our presence in many parts of the world is unwelcome. Perhaps in

those places we feel local support is not important; perhaps people's

opinions in these regions don't mean much to us; perhaps if regional rulers

are willing to sell out their own people, we have no obligation not to

exploit. But because local warlords, and despots take criminal advantage of

their own people, does not give us, as a people, the right to remain blind

to their plight, and there are legions of people in America who remain

ignorant of the suffering being funded by our dollars.

 

We have to turn the lights on. Part of how we are able to continue the

destruction of the planet is by not looking at what we do, by not taking in

the impact of our actions. I'm speaking of humanity, here, not just

Americans. We live on this earth, and as I see it, what we're are

confronting at this moment in history has more to do with the movement from

a world of nations to a global nation. I see this moment as an instigating

event of a revolution similar to the American Revolution that led to the

freedoms and rights that have made this nation great. I see the current

struggle against rogue terrorists as potentially the beginning of

restructuring global power.

 

I also don't condone the weak efforts of Muslim leaders who have failed to

stand up against the slaughter. The crimes of Taliban against their own

people are despicable. I wish I had a voice that could be heard there, I

have much to say to them. In my current missives, I'm addressing Americans.

 

Some people who experience life as fact based, as the practical, corporeal

existence, see the struggle very much in black and white, as issues of good

versus evil, as us versus them, as a matter of our lives being placed in

jeopardy. But it's not just our lives that are being threatened. It is our

way of life. It is the way we understand the world should be. It is our

identity that is being threatened. Our freedom is being threatened.  Even

from Washington, daily words emerge expressing the need to curtail our

freedom, to increase security and surveillance. We have always identified

America as the safest place to be. That is gone. We're now part of a world

where terrorism is experienced within our borders. This changes our

identity. People are living in fear of attack. This is a new way of living.

We're having to adapt to these new times and what they mean to us.

 

We identify strictly with our point of view. We bandy about words like evil

as if we were the chosen judges. Seeing evil has very much to do with how we

identify ourselves. We see ourselves as good, our actions as good, our goals

as good, our morality as good, our beliefs as good. But as I said in an

earlier email, from the point of view of the terrorists, we are the evil

ones. In their identity, that which they deem as against them is evil.

 

As Americans, we differ from those attacking us in some vitally important

ways.  Foremost, we hold to the principle that people have the right to

their beliefs, even when we disagree. The line that they cross is their lack

of tolerance. The thing that must be eliminated is the call to annihilation.

If in eliminating that call, we must rid the world of the voices and

perpetrators of heinous acts, so be it. But we must do so with humility, and

global support. We're powerful enough to unilaterally decide what we want to

do, and to do it. The problem is, that our ability to do so does not make it

right. We need participate in a greater healing even as we fight the

disease. America is not universally supported in this war. Many countries

would rather this were a police action, left to the criminal justice system,

and not a war.

 

We can not stand in judgment of others with absolute authority. We, too,

have done deplorable things to people and countries. We have sponsored

murders and terrorism. We have destabilized elected governments. We have

waged war for our selfish interests. We gave the Taliban most of their

weapons. We supported them when it suited us and left them and Afghanistan

to fend for itself when we tired of their needs. We must fight the

terrorists, but we also have to hold ourselves accountable for our actions.

This is the only way we will be able to change. If we are able to bully our

way through the middle east, we will once again prove to the world our

imperialistic drive. Today our goals today are right, but we must still

proceed with care. We cannot ignore history or public opinion. After all we

are a nation where the people's voice is sacrosanct.

 

Voices are being raised, calling for peace. People are talking about how to

solve the problems we face. In history leaders have arisen with voices

calling for greater inclusion. Gandhi led his colonized country to its

independence. Martin Luther King paved the way for American civil rights to

be enacted. They were ministers of peace. Dorothy Stearn pointed out to me

that they were all assassinated. True. They were assassinated for their

causes. They believed enough to risk their lives. But it wasn't their

nonviolence that got them killed. They were eliminated because of their

beliefs. 

 

Jesus brought forth a new compassion, revolutionizing his day. He was

killed. Good people die believing in the cause of goodness. They are not

diminished by their deaths. Death is not even the end of their work. Much

lives on beyond them. They created legacies. The course they set upon is not

easy to navigate. Does that mean we should not try as well? We need to

become more inclusive. If we could do that, we would isolate those bent on

our destruction, for they would have nowhere to hide. This is a human

endeavor, not just an American one.

 

Getting killed is no reason to abandon the cause of peace, just as being a

peace warrior is not necessarily a suicidal mission. People who lead battles

get killed, too. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated after he led the country

in a gruesome Civil War. He led the country in order to secure the abolition

of slavery, the root for much of the American economy. The cause of justice

and freedom was supreme in his mind. He was willing to die for it. John F.

Kennedy was assassinated. He was not a pacifist, but he was moving this

country into some new and important directions.

 

It is change that frightens people. We want our lives to be the way they

were, as if that was the best that was possible. We have to look to better

times, to greater joys, to more peaceful days. We have to change. It's part

of the universal law that we do. Resistance is futile. If we fight the

current of change we will exhaust ourselves trying to remain where we have

been. We should rather steer a course to safety through these turbulent

times by going in the direction that takes us to friendly shores.

 

Many are the leaders who take their followers from the outdated past into

the new present. All these changes take time. Nothing happens overnight.

When the laws are passed, there is still a long period of adjustment, while

the culture catches up with the changes on the  books. The untimely deaths

of these leaders do not diminish the importance of their accomplishments.

For each of them, their message was one that they were willing to die for.

This, too, is a worthy cause. We must end the extreme unfairness that

exists. That said, I know that ending unfairness alone will not assure an

end to hatred. We must engage this cause on many levels.

 

At the heart of the fundamentalist's power is the ignorance of their flock.

Education is replaced with indoctrination. We cannot reeducate with bombs.

Poverty and illiteracy, the restriction of information, and the control of

propaganda are the whips and chains of a dominated people. In the terror and

agony sanctioned by us lies our hypocrisy. We must look into our mistakes

and correct them. Only thus we can expect other leaders to join us. I

realize that we cannot reeducate those committed to extremist views, but I

also know that they rely on an influx of new young people to fill their

ranks. We need leaders who will guide them away from hatred. We need our

political leaders to work with spiritual leaders to find more ways to end

the reign of terror.

 

I'm not changing my opinion that something must be done to stop terrorism. I

don't have faith that the political leadership has the savvy either

militarily or politically to navigate the situation without missing the

greater sense of the spiritual and ethical issues that arise as a result of

our actions. I don't believe this is a battle that can be fought with

weapons alone. We have to pursue justice, not revenge. This is our higher

moral ground.

 

Nothing is written about what is to come. We're in virgin territory in many

ways. The sophistication and strategic ingeniousness of our enemies is

formidable. I realize that the people in the administration believe in their

policies. While they may be right that we have to use force to regain

control over the governance of the world,  we still need to gain the support

of people of the world. As we approach this new global world we've heard so

much talk about these recent decades, we need to bring the true values that

America's founders presented to the whole world.

 

Marc

 

Next letter